Signifier and Signified
Explanations > Critical Theory
> Signifier and Signified
Description | Discussion
| See also
Description
Saussure's 'theory of the sign'
defined a sign as being made up of the matched pair of signifier and signified.
Signifier
The signifier is the pointing finger, the word, the sound-image.
A word is simply a jumble of letters. The pointing finger is not the
star. It is in the interpretation of the signifier that meaning is created.
Signified
The signified is the concept, the meaning, the thing indicated by the
signifier. It need not be a 'real object' but is some referent to which
the signifier refers.
The thing signified is created in the perceiver and is internal to
them. Whilst we share concepts, we do so via signifiers.
Whilst the signifier is more stable, the signified varies between
people and contexts.
The signified does stabilize with habit, as the signifier cues
thoughts and images.
Discussion
The signifier and signified, whilst superficially simple, form a core
element of semiotics.
Saussure's ideas are contrary to Plato's notion of ideas being
eternally stable. Plato saw ideas as the root concept that was implemented in
individual instances. A signifier without signified has no meaning, and the
signified changes with person and context. For Saussure, even the root concept
is malleable.
The relationship between the signifier and the signified is arbitrary
(Saussure called this 'unmotivated'). A real object need not actually exist
'out there'. Whilst the letters 'c-a-t' spell cat, they do not embody
'catness'. The French 'chat' is not identical to the English 'cat' in the
signified that it creates (to the French, 'chat' has differences of meaning).
In French, 'mouton' means both 'mutton' and a living 'sheep', whilst the
English does not differentiate.
Saussure inverts the usual reflectionist view that the signifier
reflects the signified: the signifier creates the signified in terms of
the meaning it triggers for us. The meaning of a sign needs both the signifier
and the signified as created by an interpreter. A signifier without a signified
is noise. A signified without a signifier is impossible.
Language is a series of 'negative' values in that each sign marks a divergence
of meaning betweens signs. Words have meaning in the difference and relationships
with other words.
The language forms a 'conceptual grid', as defined by structural
anthropologist Edmund Leach, which we impose on the world in order to make
sense.
Lacan
defined the unconscious as being structured like language and dealing with a
shifting set of signifiers. When we think in words and images, these still
signify: they are not the final signified, which appears as a more abstract
sensation. In that we can never know the Real,
the external signified can neither be truly known.
Jaques Derrida
criticized the neat simplicity of signs. The signifier-signified is stable only
if one term is final and incapable of referring beyond itself, which is not
true. Meaning is deferred as you slide between signs.